Showing posts with label atlanta medical jobs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atlanta medical jobs. Show all posts

Thursday, November 6, 2008

How did the Medical Professionals Fare in the Congressional Elections?




On his Wall Street Journal Health Blog, Jacob Goldstein took a look at Tuesday's congressional elections. Check it out:
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/11/06/how-many-doctors-are-in-the-house

"Enough with the Democrats and Republicans. How did doctors do in Tuesday’s Congressional elections?
Pretty well: There will be at least 14 MDs in the 111th Congress, a pickup of two seats from the current session, the AMA told us.
Ten of the docs are Republicans and four are Democrats. Don’t hold your breath for them to band together to overcome party differences and lead the nation toward health-care reform.
“You’d think the physicians’ caucus would provide leadership to the parties, but it hasn’t worked out that way,” Michael Burgess, a Texas ob-gyn first elected to the House in 2002, told the Health Blog. “In my humble opinion, there aren’t enough doctors in Congress. It leaves us with a pretty narrow group of individuals, and it’s a little harder to build consensus on common ground.”
Even issues where McCain and Obama shared common ground may prove thorny. Take, for example, moving Medicare payments away from the current fee-for-service payment model — an idea many doctors, including Burgess, are wary of. “Had Sen. McCain been successful, I was hoping to work on him about that,” Burgess told us.
All nine docs who ran for re-election in the House of Representatives held on to their seats, according to the AMA. Another, Florida Republican and internist David Weldon, retired. (A family doc ran as a Democrat to fill Weldon’s seat, but lost to a Republican Realtor who has served in Florida’s Legislature.)
There are two docs in the Senate: Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) ran for re-election and won; John Barasso (R., Wyo.) wasn’t up for reelection.
Three MDs were newly elected to the House; another 15 ran and lost (not as grim as it might sound, given the long odds against unseating incumbents). And one Maryland race, in which an anesthesiologist is running as a Republican for an open seat, is still too close to call, the Baltimore Sun reported this morning.
Specialty Bonus: Five of the 14 docs in Congress are ob-gyn, making it the most common specialty on the Hill. (Insert joke about a “national re-birth” or “delivering change” here.) Family medicine comes in second

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Offshore Medical Services Increasing in the United States

The Wall Street Journal published an article by Amar Gupta about the information technology revolution in the medical field. Not only will your doctor not be in the room with you, but he may be half way around the world. Read on!

Health care has managed to avoid the information-technology revolution. But it won't for much longer.
By AMAR GUPTA

"The health-care industry is about to undergo a global revolution driven by a force it can no longer resist: information technology.
While hospitals and other care providers have long been quick to adopt breakthrough technology in medical devices, procedures and treatments, far less attention has focused on innovations in networking and communications.

This is partly because of concerns about breaches in security and patient privacy, and because health care until recently was a service always performed locally, and in person. Big computer networks and the core benefits they offer -- such as increased group productivity and access to data -- weren't on the health-care sector's radar screen.

But that is about to change. IT security will eventually meet the expectations of the health-care industry, just as has happened in other sectors, like banking. And when it does, powerful IT networks crisscrossing the globe will change the way much of health care is delivered: Outsourcing and offshoring of medical and nonmedical services will increase, providing more efficient health care at the most cost-effective rates; systems integrations will allow more medical records to be transferred swiftly and securely; efforts to monitor the safety of medicines will gain global access to data; and professionals and patients will find authoritative and up-to-date information on every specialty online.

In the future, there will be three often overlapping modes of delivering health-care services: services performed in person by humans, services that can be performed by people at a remote location, and services performed by computers without direct human involvement. Offshore outsourcing in combination with a 24-hour work cycle will be appropriate when certain conditions are met -- mainly, if the information involved in the task can be digitized, and if workers at different sites can do their jobs independently from one another.
These changes won't come quickly. There will be plenty of obstacles as institutions and networks reach across borders and encounter different laws as well as technical standards. Licensing, accreditation and accounting issues will arise as well. But eventually all such issues can be resolved by proper regulatory structures and market forces.

In the meantime, health-care organizations that don't join in the coming changes will incur higher costs and less integration. This will make them less competitive in the global health-care marketplace, just as is happening with companies that have resisted outsourcing and systems integration in other sectors.
What follows is a look at four major ways in which IT will revolutionize health care: more offshore services, integration of health-information systems, drug-safety monitoring on a global scale, and more high-quality information to doctors and patients.

The most noticeable changes will be the offshore outsourcing of diagnostic services -- particularly imaging, such as X-rays and mammograms -- and consultations by specialists.
Doctors in the U.S. and other countries have long practiced variations of telemedicine to provide care to patients in hard-to-reach and underserved locations. But in the future, telemedicine will be practiced more as a way of distributing work loads and lowering costs. Teleradiology in particular, in which X-rays are taken at one location and then transmitted to doctors at another site, appears ripe for expansion.

Forces driving the growth of teleradiology include a significant shortage of radiologists, aging populations and more use of imaging in trauma situations, which in turn has fueled a need for 24-hour radiological services in emergency rooms.
With robust IT networks, a single radiologist can support multiple hospitals, or large hospitals can serve as central image-reading sites, spreading the work among a staff of radiologists. Remote sites can be set up with just imaging equipment and technicians, extending radiology services to underserved regions. Offshore outsourcing, meanwhile, can mean that images taken in the middle of the night are still read right away by a wide-awake radiologist working at the height of his or her powers.

The Past: Health care mostly ignored information technology for years. Goals such as linking groups of workers and improving communication weren't priorities for an industry more concerned with delivering services in person and protecting privacy.
The Present: Now, improvements in network security and the ability to transmit images and data around the world have opened the door to changes that will revolutionize the sector.
The Future: Most noticeably, robust IT networks will allow offshore outsourcing of certain medical and nonmedical services and integration of information systems, making health care more efficient and cost-effective. Groups that don't adopt some form of outsourcing will fail to keep up with competitive cost pressures, as has happened in other industries.
The biggest hurdles to the expansion of teleradiology may be the credentialing and billing processes. While many countries will give a doctor a license to practice anywhere in that nation, the practice in the U.S. is to issue licenses at a state level. This creates more bureaucracy. Most states require medical professionals to be U.S. citizens or legal residents in order to be licensed. Also, it is difficult for doctors abroad to get reimbursement from insurance companies in the U.S. for telemedicine services.

Another reason to outsource more medical services abroad: The World Health Organization and the American Cancer Society have identified working at night as a possible cause of cancer. Such a finding may help fuel efforts to wean medical workers from graveyard shifts. Video cameras and other equipment can monitor sleeping hospital patients in other cities, states or countries. Similarly, sleep studies, in which the patient is observed for a full night at a sleep center, can base patients in one country and technicians in another. If the patient develops unusual symptoms, medical personnel can be summoned on the scene.
Over time, the offshore outsourcing of more medical services will benefit developed countries because it can provide faster diagnosis and lower overall costs. Offshore outsourcing also can benefit developing nations, by giving patients more access to expert health care. However, there is a shortage of medical professionals both in developed and developing countries, and the diversion of such resources to foreign patients can potentially aggravate the shortage. These issues, and others, will be partly resolved by market forces.

Globally integrated health-information systems are evolving, along with standardized formats for patient records -- making the charts easier to translate.
A detailed medical history can be critical if a person suffers an illness or accident far from home. Integrated information systems and records that translate easily would be of enormous help in natural disasters and other mass-casualty situations in which the victims come from many different places.

But current hospital information systems were designed to function as islands with their own rules and formats, making a patient's file at one hospital difficult for another to read. Not only are different languages and measures sometimes used, but conflicts between encryption and other software can make it impossible for systems to exchange data electronically.
Computer programs and Internet technology will play big roles in overcoming such obstacles. But experts in IT and medicine will also be indispensable at every stage, whether for building the tools for integration or assisting in specific records transfers.
Hospitals and other health-care organizations in the U.S. have started to make a dent in this area, using domestic medical and IT personnel to develop systems for the electronic exchange of medical records. But so much remains to be done, the higher cost and relative scarcity of U.S. labor available for this work is most likely to lead the industry to outsourcing abroad.
Meanwhile, a precedent already exists for fast and secure international transmissions of U.S. medical records. U.S. hospitals and doctors increasingly rely on workers abroad to transcribe audio recordings into written notes. Typically, the audio recording will be sent in the evening, U.S. time, to transcriptionists in India, for whom it is morning. A written version of the recording is then available to the doctor over the Web before the next day shift begins in the U.S.

As people become more mobile, an international database on drug safety will be created.
Various programs currently do this kind of work in their home countries, including MedWatch, an initiative of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that investigates and reports on adverse drug reactions and other safety issues involving medical products. MedWatch gets reports from a wide network of domestic sources, including pharmacy companies, insurers and professional associations in the medical, dentistry and nursing fields. But no agency routinely collects and shares information between countries. So, incidents involving medicines purchased abroad can fall through the cracks. This is a growing concern in the U.S. not only because people are traveling more, but also because U.S. residents increasingly purchase prescription drugs from pharmacies in Canada and other countries because of lower prices.

A possible prototype for a global watchdog already exists, designed by researchers from the University of Arizona for the Critical Path Institute. Co-founded by the FDA, C-Path is a nonprofit based in Tucson, Ariz., and Rockville, Md., that researches areas related to drug development and safety. The prototype envisions a network that would connect and share data among multiple organizations including: companies or groups that tested or helped produce the drug; the FDA and equivalent agencies in other countries; and the doctor or organization that prescribed the medication. Individual pharmacies, too, would participate directly -- a critical contribution, since they have the information about buyers, dates and quantities.
Serious challenges to this vision exist, such as different reporting procedures in various countries, and potential conflicts in software and Web protocols. The technical conflicts can be solved over time by IT experts working toward standardization. As with systems-integration challenges, costs and labor shortages will drive the use of offshore labor.
Meanwhile, with the right infrastructure and incentives, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians could replace the current hodgepodge of reporting methods by becoming designated agents for collecting raw information on patients' medication histories, including adverse reactions.

The latest medical knowledge will appear on Web sites edited by eminent specialists in those fields.
Doctors and scientists from around the world will contribute material, and automated search tools will capture updates from, say, a trusted clinical study. The reliance on IT and editorial workers in less-expensive countries, meanwhile, will help make such endeavors more economically viable.
Such sites are likely to take shape as hybrids of information sources and tools, drawing from online textbooks, medical journals, wiki-style editing and automatic updates from various trusted data sources. While the sites will have human editors, developers are working on tools to help comb through the large number of newly published and potentially relevant articles that need to be considered each week. The goal will be not just to increase the amount of medical information at people's fingertips, but also to make it specific, up-to-date, reliable and easier to find.
The detailed nature of this kind of work, and competitive cost pressures, will mean that a mix of medical and IT professionals will have to be employed both in the U.S. and abroad.
The eventual benefits, meanwhile -- from all of the advances predicted -- will be universal."
—Dr. Gupta is the Thomas R. Brown professor of management and technology at the University of Arizona. He can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Thoughts about Social Network Sites for Business



I am a fan/student of technology, the internet and any new and exciting trends for business. I have been researching the use of social networking sites for business purposes and have even joined Linked In and My Space and have linked them to my website. I think the following article by Karen E. Klein in Business Week aptly discusses this subject. Enjoy.



"To get the most out of social networking sites, small companies should look past the hype, set concrete business goals, then start experimenting. Social networking online seems to be exploding: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Digg, and so on. When I ask how these sites can help my business, the answers can be vague. I am trying to relate it to face-to-face networking, which includes sharing ideas, information, and resources with other businesses. Are these sites useful for those goals? There is only so much time in my day and I need to use it effectively. —B.H., Scarborough, Me.



You are correct that social networking is a rapidly growing, headline-grabbing phenomenon. The question for entrepreneurs is how to tap into this trend as a business opportunity, rather than simply a way to connect—or reconnect—with people, says Peter Delgrosso, strategic vice-president for corporate communications with Web.com (WWWW).
"For the most part, these social networking sites should be viewed as complementary to your online presence. Think of it as a nice-to-have, not a must-have," he says. "When used properly, it is something that can gain your business some attention. However, you need to realize it shouldn't be seen as a replacement to your traditional online presence."
Greg Sterling, of Sterling Market Intelligence, considers social network sites primarily for meeting people, asking for advice or referrals and, carefully, doing online marketing. The uses vary by application or site, he notes: "Sites such as LinkedIn can be helpful in connecting with people you want to meet for one reason or another. Twitter and Facebook can be helpful when you're trying to notify a group of people about something you want to promote or about a happening of some kind."



Find Your Networking Niche



Take a few minutes—it doesn't have to be extensive—to look over the top sites and experiment to see what works for you. Even an hour or two a week can help you figure out which sites you like best and are most effective for your particular business. "The viral nature of social networking is quite extraordinary and something that can garner a lot of attention to your efforts in a hurry," Delgrosso says.
He thinks the best site for both networking and human resources purposes is LinkedIn. "The site requires some résumé creation, then offers the opportunity to link in to other like-minded professionals. When used selectively, it can be a very powerful tool for identifying new business partners, new employees, or simply building your personal or business presence," he says.
For gaining exposure to larger audiences, he recommends Facebook: "Consider establishing or joining a network on Facebook based on your business or industry category to tap into people's affinity for the topic. By doing this, you'll cut through the clutter and clearly establish your niche, keeping the interaction focused on the specific subject matter."
Rick Julian, CEO and chief creative officer of Quo Vadis, a startup brand communications agency, says he's getting a positive return on his investment from using social media sites for the past year. "It puts a human face on your business and allows people to get an impression of what a relationship with you would be like. When all things remain equal, people want to work with people they think they'll have an interesting relationship with," Julian says. His firm is represented on five major social networking sites, including YouTube (GOOG) and his blog, and a couple of smaller ones.



"Geometric Extension" and Search Optimization
It sounds like a full-time job, but Julian points out that you can cut and paste some of your content from site to site. "If I put up a YouTube video to create awareness, I might have some discussion on YouTube with the responders and then also put it on my blog, on my Facebook company page, and promote a link to it on Twitter. Just by generating that single asset, I've populated all those networks with content without having to come up with an original piece of content for each of them. There's a geometric extension of your reach," he says.
Robert Jenson, CEO of the Las Vegas-based realty firm the Jenson Group, takes a strictly corporate approach to social networking. "Rather than blogging stream-of-consciousness opinions or using the venue as a diary of sorts, I educate visitors on important, universal industry matters. I try my utmost to ensure the content I post is not just applicable and of interest to those in Las Vegas, where I operate, but also to any real estate consumer nationwide," he says.



He puts bylined articles he's written on his own blog and on social networking sites and uses them to establish his credibility as a real estate expert. "This serves as a 'risk reliever' for both prospective consumers and business affiliates, while also increasing my chances for media coverage by establishing myself as a reliable expert source," Jenson says.
Last, but definitely not least, is the value of social networking sites to search engine optimization (BusinessWeek, 6/20/08). The more sites that include your name and link back to your Web site or blog, the higher your profile rises in search engines, where more and more of your customers are likely to find you, Jenson says. "



Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Dermatologists Reportedly Offer Two Tiered Skin Care


I read the Schwitzer Health News Blog and found the following topic discussed on the blog to be quite interesting. According to the blog, The New York Times reported that dermatologists are now serving first class and second class services and "it is fast becoming a two-tier business in which higher-paying customers often receive greater pampering."

Excerpt:
"In some dermatologists’ offices, freer-spending cosmetic patients are given appointments more quickly than medical patients for whom health insurance pays fixed reimbursement fees.
In other offices, cosmetic patients spend more time with a doctor. And in still others, doctors employ a special receptionist, called a cosmetic concierge, for their beauty patients.
Dr. David M. Pariser, a dermatologist in Norfolk, Va., and the president-elect of the American Academy of Dermatology, said some practices did maintain preferential policies for cosmetic patients.
“The message is that the cosmetic patient is more important than the medical patient, and that’s not a good message,” Dr. Pariser said.
At a time when dermatologists are trying to advance the idea of a national skin cancer epidemic, such a two-tier system is raising concerns that the coddling of beauty patients may divert attention from skin diseases."

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Do Applicants Really Lie on Their Resumes?


As part of our screening process, All Medical Personnel checks the work references and criminal background of each and every applicant. Do statistics lie? According to a recent survey by Background Information Services in Cleveland, more than half of all job seekers lie on their resumés, often by inflating their job titles. Here's how to determine whether you've really found the right person for the job.



From: Inc. Magazine, February 2007 By: Jennifer Gill
Where did you find the candidate?Referrals from your own top employees are the best bet. If your hiring manager found the applicant at a job fair, be skeptical. Great players aren't hawking their resumé at job fairs; they're working.
Who did the interviewing?Don't rely solely on the opinion of the hiring manager. Make sure she has involved some of the employees who will work directly with this person. They'll have the best sense of whether the candidate will fit in.
Why is the candidate leaving his or her current job?This can be tough to draw out of some candidates--after all, they don't want to talk themselves out of a job. But you need to know what saps their motivation. Maybe they feel undervalued or hate traveling. Try to understand what will make them eager to come to work on Monday morning.
Is the candidate coming from a competitor?This is a two-for-one special: a talented new employee with inside knowledge of a rival's operations. Recruiting is a prime way to gather intelligence on competitors, such as how much they pay people and what business plans they have under way.
Is the candidate connected?Candidates who are at the top of their games will be on a first-name basis with other top people in the industry. Ask a candidate to recommend three of the best people at his or her current workplace to come in for interviews. Noncompete agreements can thwart such efforts, however, so be sure to ask if the candidate has signed one with his current employer, notes Margaretta Noonan, executive vice president of Hudson Highland Group (NASDAQ:HHGP), a global staffing firm in New York City.
Could the candidate do my job?No one likes to think he or she is replaceable, but smart bosses hire people with potential, and that's especially critical at a company in growth mode. A manager who has your interests in mind will recruit someone with the chops to eventually move into a more senior role. You should also ask if the candidate demonstrates leadership skills and decision-making abilities.
The candidate graduated from college, right?Beware of the word attended on a resumé. Last year, ADP Screening and Selection Services found that about half of the 330,000 people it ran background checks on lied about their education or work experience. Hire an outside firm if necessary to vet candidates. If there's an unexplained gap on a resumé, find out why.
How long has this job been open?If the answer is a month or more, consider putting someone else in charge of hiring. The best people on the job market are scooped up in days, notes John Sullivan, a consultant and professor of management at San Francisco State University. If it takes too long, you may be getting benchwarmers, not first-string players.
Copyright © 2008 Mansueto Ventures LLC. All rights reserved.Inc.com, 7 World Trade Center, New York, NY 10007-2195.