Friday, October 24, 2008

Best and Worst Excuses for Not Going to Work


An amusing survey for a Friday courtesy of "HR Strange But True" and Careerbuilder.com .....enjoy!


"Employees have a variety of excuses to explain an absence from work to their employer. Some are typical (e.g., "I am sick") and some are atypical (e.g., "My psychic told me to stay home"). We have 11 more of the latter for you. Tell us if you think these are really good excuses or really bad ones.


CareerBuilder.com conducts an annual survey among employers and employees on absenteeism. This year, when the survey asked employers to identify the strangest reasons employees have given to explain an absence, they cited the following examples:
Employee's wife burned all his clothes, and he had nothing to wear to work.
Employee didn't want to lose the parking space in front of his house.
Employee hit a turkey while riding a bike.
Employee said he had a heart attack early that morning, but that he was "all better now."
Employee donated too much blood.
Employee's dog was stressed out after a family reunion.
Employee was kicked by a deer.
Employee contracted mono after kissing a mailroom intern at the company holiday party and suggested the company post some sort of notice to warn others who may have kissed him.
Employee swallowed too much mouthwash.
Employee's toe was injured when a soda can fell out of the refrigerator.
Employee was up all night because the police were investigating the death of someone discovered behind her house.


If one of your employees called you with one of those excuses, would you believe him or her?
The survey found that 33 percent of employees admit to calling work with a fake excuse to explain an absence at least once this year.
The top reasons for doing so included:
Needed to relax and recharge (30 percent)
Had to go to a doctor's appointment (27 percent)
Catch up on sleep (22 percent)
Run personal errands (14 percent)
Catch up on housework (11 percent)
Spend time with family and friends (11 percent)
Wanted to miss a meeting, buy some time to work on a project that was already due, or avoid the wrath of a boss or colleague (9 percent)
Are employees fooling their employers? Not all the time. The survey found that 31 percent of employers said they have checked up on an employee who called in sick.
The most common ways those employers checked up on employees included:
Requiring the employee to show a doctor's note (71 percent)
Calling the employee at home (56 percent)
Having another worker call the employee (18 percent)
Driving by the employee's house or apartment (17 percent)
The survey included more than 6,800 workers and 3,300 employers.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Obama v. McCain....how do healthcare plans stack up?



In addition to the general economy, business owners and managers want to know what will happen to their healthcare plans under a McCain administration or an Obama administration. Jacob Goldsteins blogs about this very subject in his blog on the Wall Street Journal website.


"....... nobody really knows how the Obama or McCain health plan would work in the real world. But some smart people have taken some educated guesses. In her healthy consumer column today, the WSJ’s Anna Wilde Mathews wades into the fray and returns with some figures.
Among families making between $50,00 and $149,000 annually, roughly 40% would save more than $2,500 a year on health costs under McCain’s plan in the short term, according to an analysis by the Lewin Group, a health care consultancy.
Those who come out best could be people who are young and healthy — those who are pretty cheap to insure. People who are older, or who have a history of health trouble, could have a harder time under the McCain plan.


Most American families in the short term would save money on health insurance or see little effect under the Obama plan, the group said. Among households earning between $50,000 and $150,000 a year, more than 60% would see health-insurance costs decline by $250 or more.
Low and moderate-income people might qualify for new assistance under the Obama plan. And those with health troubles would benefit from a rule that would require insurance companies to cover all comers. On the other hand, healthy people who don’t qualify for subsidies could see their insurance costs rise under the plan.


What happens in the long term is anyone’s guess. The Tax Policy Center, which is affiliated with the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, projected the Obama plan would cost $1.6 trillion over 10 years, and the McCain plan would cost $1.3 trillion. Lewin Group had different figures putting the cost at $2.1 trillion for McCain’s plan and $1.2 trillion for Obama.
The candidates say they are prepared to pay for the plans, but they rely heavily on cost savings gained from new efficiencies. And, as anybody who pays attention to health care knows, it’s easy to point to inefficiencies, but hard to realize significant cost savings.


Bonus Dollars: McCain has said folks who have a hard time buying insurance on the open market would get help from something called the Guaranteed Access Plan. McCain adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin told the WSJ that the plan could cost the feds $15 billion to $20 billion a year. Other funding would come from states and insurers. The Lewin Group estimates that the program could for the federal government would rise each year, to as much as $33 billion a year after a decade."

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Offshore Medical Services Increasing in the United States

The Wall Street Journal published an article by Amar Gupta about the information technology revolution in the medical field. Not only will your doctor not be in the room with you, but he may be half way around the world. Read on!

Health care has managed to avoid the information-technology revolution. But it won't for much longer.
By AMAR GUPTA

"The health-care industry is about to undergo a global revolution driven by a force it can no longer resist: information technology.
While hospitals and other care providers have long been quick to adopt breakthrough technology in medical devices, procedures and treatments, far less attention has focused on innovations in networking and communications.

This is partly because of concerns about breaches in security and patient privacy, and because health care until recently was a service always performed locally, and in person. Big computer networks and the core benefits they offer -- such as increased group productivity and access to data -- weren't on the health-care sector's radar screen.

But that is about to change. IT security will eventually meet the expectations of the health-care industry, just as has happened in other sectors, like banking. And when it does, powerful IT networks crisscrossing the globe will change the way much of health care is delivered: Outsourcing and offshoring of medical and nonmedical services will increase, providing more efficient health care at the most cost-effective rates; systems integrations will allow more medical records to be transferred swiftly and securely; efforts to monitor the safety of medicines will gain global access to data; and professionals and patients will find authoritative and up-to-date information on every specialty online.

In the future, there will be three often overlapping modes of delivering health-care services: services performed in person by humans, services that can be performed by people at a remote location, and services performed by computers without direct human involvement. Offshore outsourcing in combination with a 24-hour work cycle will be appropriate when certain conditions are met -- mainly, if the information involved in the task can be digitized, and if workers at different sites can do their jobs independently from one another.
These changes won't come quickly. There will be plenty of obstacles as institutions and networks reach across borders and encounter different laws as well as technical standards. Licensing, accreditation and accounting issues will arise as well. But eventually all such issues can be resolved by proper regulatory structures and market forces.

In the meantime, health-care organizations that don't join in the coming changes will incur higher costs and less integration. This will make them less competitive in the global health-care marketplace, just as is happening with companies that have resisted outsourcing and systems integration in other sectors.
What follows is a look at four major ways in which IT will revolutionize health care: more offshore services, integration of health-information systems, drug-safety monitoring on a global scale, and more high-quality information to doctors and patients.

The most noticeable changes will be the offshore outsourcing of diagnostic services -- particularly imaging, such as X-rays and mammograms -- and consultations by specialists.
Doctors in the U.S. and other countries have long practiced variations of telemedicine to provide care to patients in hard-to-reach and underserved locations. But in the future, telemedicine will be practiced more as a way of distributing work loads and lowering costs. Teleradiology in particular, in which X-rays are taken at one location and then transmitted to doctors at another site, appears ripe for expansion.

Forces driving the growth of teleradiology include a significant shortage of radiologists, aging populations and more use of imaging in trauma situations, which in turn has fueled a need for 24-hour radiological services in emergency rooms.
With robust IT networks, a single radiologist can support multiple hospitals, or large hospitals can serve as central image-reading sites, spreading the work among a staff of radiologists. Remote sites can be set up with just imaging equipment and technicians, extending radiology services to underserved regions. Offshore outsourcing, meanwhile, can mean that images taken in the middle of the night are still read right away by a wide-awake radiologist working at the height of his or her powers.

The Past: Health care mostly ignored information technology for years. Goals such as linking groups of workers and improving communication weren't priorities for an industry more concerned with delivering services in person and protecting privacy.
The Present: Now, improvements in network security and the ability to transmit images and data around the world have opened the door to changes that will revolutionize the sector.
The Future: Most noticeably, robust IT networks will allow offshore outsourcing of certain medical and nonmedical services and integration of information systems, making health care more efficient and cost-effective. Groups that don't adopt some form of outsourcing will fail to keep up with competitive cost pressures, as has happened in other industries.
The biggest hurdles to the expansion of teleradiology may be the credentialing and billing processes. While many countries will give a doctor a license to practice anywhere in that nation, the practice in the U.S. is to issue licenses at a state level. This creates more bureaucracy. Most states require medical professionals to be U.S. citizens or legal residents in order to be licensed. Also, it is difficult for doctors abroad to get reimbursement from insurance companies in the U.S. for telemedicine services.

Another reason to outsource more medical services abroad: The World Health Organization and the American Cancer Society have identified working at night as a possible cause of cancer. Such a finding may help fuel efforts to wean medical workers from graveyard shifts. Video cameras and other equipment can monitor sleeping hospital patients in other cities, states or countries. Similarly, sleep studies, in which the patient is observed for a full night at a sleep center, can base patients in one country and technicians in another. If the patient develops unusual symptoms, medical personnel can be summoned on the scene.
Over time, the offshore outsourcing of more medical services will benefit developed countries because it can provide faster diagnosis and lower overall costs. Offshore outsourcing also can benefit developing nations, by giving patients more access to expert health care. However, there is a shortage of medical professionals both in developed and developing countries, and the diversion of such resources to foreign patients can potentially aggravate the shortage. These issues, and others, will be partly resolved by market forces.

Globally integrated health-information systems are evolving, along with standardized formats for patient records -- making the charts easier to translate.
A detailed medical history can be critical if a person suffers an illness or accident far from home. Integrated information systems and records that translate easily would be of enormous help in natural disasters and other mass-casualty situations in which the victims come from many different places.

But current hospital information systems were designed to function as islands with their own rules and formats, making a patient's file at one hospital difficult for another to read. Not only are different languages and measures sometimes used, but conflicts between encryption and other software can make it impossible for systems to exchange data electronically.
Computer programs and Internet technology will play big roles in overcoming such obstacles. But experts in IT and medicine will also be indispensable at every stage, whether for building the tools for integration or assisting in specific records transfers.
Hospitals and other health-care organizations in the U.S. have started to make a dent in this area, using domestic medical and IT personnel to develop systems for the electronic exchange of medical records. But so much remains to be done, the higher cost and relative scarcity of U.S. labor available for this work is most likely to lead the industry to outsourcing abroad.
Meanwhile, a precedent already exists for fast and secure international transmissions of U.S. medical records. U.S. hospitals and doctors increasingly rely on workers abroad to transcribe audio recordings into written notes. Typically, the audio recording will be sent in the evening, U.S. time, to transcriptionists in India, for whom it is morning. A written version of the recording is then available to the doctor over the Web before the next day shift begins in the U.S.

As people become more mobile, an international database on drug safety will be created.
Various programs currently do this kind of work in their home countries, including MedWatch, an initiative of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that investigates and reports on adverse drug reactions and other safety issues involving medical products. MedWatch gets reports from a wide network of domestic sources, including pharmacy companies, insurers and professional associations in the medical, dentistry and nursing fields. But no agency routinely collects and shares information between countries. So, incidents involving medicines purchased abroad can fall through the cracks. This is a growing concern in the U.S. not only because people are traveling more, but also because U.S. residents increasingly purchase prescription drugs from pharmacies in Canada and other countries because of lower prices.

A possible prototype for a global watchdog already exists, designed by researchers from the University of Arizona for the Critical Path Institute. Co-founded by the FDA, C-Path is a nonprofit based in Tucson, Ariz., and Rockville, Md., that researches areas related to drug development and safety. The prototype envisions a network that would connect and share data among multiple organizations including: companies or groups that tested or helped produce the drug; the FDA and equivalent agencies in other countries; and the doctor or organization that prescribed the medication. Individual pharmacies, too, would participate directly -- a critical contribution, since they have the information about buyers, dates and quantities.
Serious challenges to this vision exist, such as different reporting procedures in various countries, and potential conflicts in software and Web protocols. The technical conflicts can be solved over time by IT experts working toward standardization. As with systems-integration challenges, costs and labor shortages will drive the use of offshore labor.
Meanwhile, with the right infrastructure and incentives, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians could replace the current hodgepodge of reporting methods by becoming designated agents for collecting raw information on patients' medication histories, including adverse reactions.

The latest medical knowledge will appear on Web sites edited by eminent specialists in those fields.
Doctors and scientists from around the world will contribute material, and automated search tools will capture updates from, say, a trusted clinical study. The reliance on IT and editorial workers in less-expensive countries, meanwhile, will help make such endeavors more economically viable.
Such sites are likely to take shape as hybrids of information sources and tools, drawing from online textbooks, medical journals, wiki-style editing and automatic updates from various trusted data sources. While the sites will have human editors, developers are working on tools to help comb through the large number of newly published and potentially relevant articles that need to be considered each week. The goal will be not just to increase the amount of medical information at people's fingertips, but also to make it specific, up-to-date, reliable and easier to find.
The detailed nature of this kind of work, and competitive cost pressures, will mean that a mix of medical and IT professionals will have to be employed both in the U.S. and abroad.
The eventual benefits, meanwhile -- from all of the advances predicted -- will be universal."
—Dr. Gupta is the Thomas R. Brown professor of management and technology at the University of Arizona. He can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Motivating Your Team in Difficult Economic Times




In this economic climate, it is imperative to keep your staff motivated. Nancy Mobley, an Inc.com blogger had some terrific ideas. Read on:
"It’s challenging to keep up morale and motivate staff when the marketplace is filled with uncertainty. Having survived several economic cycles, I’ve seen the benefits of investing in staff even during the lean times. During those times, I’ve been able to count on employees to keep my business engine going and as the market opens up, they've been there to help the company take advantage of new opportunities.
Even when budgets are tight, there are ways to reward and recognize employees without spending a lot of money. One obvious but often overlooked approach is to make it a regular practice to thank employees and acknowledge their contributions. I’m always amazed at how far a simple “great job” goes in generating goodwill.
Some other ways to let employees know that they are appreciated, include:
• Establishing a special award, such as a “Star for the Day,” to recognize outstanding performers. You might give them a gift certificate to a mall, or token gift to show your appreciation.
• Planning get-togethers to bring employees together. Create opportunities for employees to socialize, such as Friday afternoon get-togethers, impromptu pizza parties and celebrations for birthdays, team accomplishments, and other occasions.
• Establishing holiday traditions, such as annual volunteer day or company outings.
• Pulling together a cross-functional team to serve on the fun committee and build up company spirit.
• Using e-mail, a company newsletter, or bulletin board to praise individual and team accomplishments and recognize birthdays and other occasions.
It’s always important to keep the lines of communication open, offer a flexible and family/friendly environment, and make sure that everyone feels respected. By rewarding your employees, you’ll reap the benefits of a strong and dedicated team. It’s a terrific competitive advantage."